Growth & Marketing Infrastructure
Attribution: one agreed answer to “what brought them in”
“Other” is your biggest channel
The source field on most leads is blank, “other”, or whatever the person taking the call picked first. Calls come through the main number with no trace of what prompted them, and word of mouth, often the best channel, leaves no record at all.
Attribution fixes the capture first. Every door the customer can come through records how they got there, conflicts are settled by a rule everyone agreed, and the result is stored on the lead and carried to the job it becomes.
Today, and with attribution
Today
- 01One phone number everywhere, so calls have no source.
- 02A source dropdown filled in by whoever answers.
- 03Referrals and word of mouth go unrecorded.
- 04Each ad platform claims its own results.
Budget decisions are made without knowing what works.
With attribution
- 01A tracking number per channel, tagged links on every campaign.
- 02“How did you hear about us?” asked on the form and the first call.
- 03Referral codes for customers who recommend you.
- 04One rule settles conflicts; the source travels to the job.
Every job with a source you can stand behind.
A source at every door
When the evidence disagrees
L-2241 · evidence disagrees
- recorded
- tagged link from a search ad, Oct 9
- said
- “a neighbour told me about you”
- rule
- first recorded touch gets the credit
- result
- source: search ad · influenced by: neighbour
- why keep both
- referrals show up in monthly reporting, even when an ad was clicked
L-2232 · two touches
- recorded
- called the van number, Oct 8; called the site number, Oct 10
- said
- “found you searching”
- rule
- first recorded touch gets the credit
- result
- source: van · also: site, search
- note
- the van brings work the ads get credit for elsewhere
L-2250 · nothing recorded
- recorded
- called the main line
- said
- didn't remember
- rule
- unknown stays unknown
- result
- source: unknown
- follow-up
- asked again at the visit by the technician
The parts it's built from
Settle
- every piece of evidence on the lead
- the written rule
no evidence → unknown, asked again later
What changes from one business to the next
A common starting point is a call tracking service with a number per channel, tagged links from your campaign tools, your CRM's source fields, and n8n to settle and record sources. These are starting candidates, not requirements.
Is attribution the right system?
Good fit
- You spend on more than one channel.
- Many leads arrive by phone.
- Source fields today are mostly blank or “other”.
Avoid when
- Almost all work comes from one known channel.
- The CRM can't store a source on leads and jobs.
How we'd approach it
01
Understand
As much as the problem needs
We map how the work runs today: who does what, which systems hold the records, and where it breaks.
02
Design
Decided before it's built
Ownership, rules, integrations and exceptions, agreed with you and written down with acceptance criteria.
03
Build
Connected to what you use
We build the scoped system, connect it to the tools you already run, and test it on the cases that matter.
Questions about attribution
Isn't call tracking expensive?
A number per channel usually costs little compared with the spend it explains. We start with the channels you spend most on.
Do customers mind being asked how they heard?
Rarely, if it's one question with simple options. It's often the only way to record word of mouth.
Which rule should we use?
Most service businesses start with first recorded touch, and keep every other piece of evidence alongside it.
Will this tell us which channel to cut?
It tells you where credit falls under your rule. To know what happens if you cut a channel, test it in one area first.
Find out where your work really comes from
Tell us how you track lead sources today and how much ends up as “other”. We'll show you how each source would be captured.